linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not support it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141209001119.GA24661@shangw>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:11:19 +1100
From:	Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Kordík <kordikmarek@...il.com>,
	Alexey Voronkov <zermond@...il.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not
 support it

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:59:54PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
><benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 13:52 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> 2. or scan the children resource other than ROM to clear bridge MEM_64
>>>    for mmio pref.
>>>
>>> The patch is using second way so will keep child mmio pref into bridge
>>> mmio pref range.
>>
>> That means that having a single ROM BAR that is 32-bit and prefetchable
>> will downgrade the entire window to 32-bit ? That's not going to work
>> either.
>
>the ROM BAR get skipped during the checking.
>
>+                       if (i != PCI_ROM_RESOURCE)
>+                               mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>+               }
>
>>
>> I have GPUs with 16G BARs for example... suddenly they don't fit
>> anaymore because we downgraded the window to 32 bit because somewhere
>> there's a 32-bit pref resource ?
>>
>> That will break more than it fixes...
>
>Please check if this patch break your platform. I tried on my setup on
>x86. and it is still
>working on 64 bit resource allocation.
>

I'm going to give it a spin and Richard, could you please apply Yinghai's
patch to see if your SRIOV code can work properly?

Thanks,
Gavin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/