linux-kernel - Re: selftests: question about git repos containing selftest.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1418158435.10123.10.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:53:55 -0800
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Cc:	"Young, David" <dayoung@...mai.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkh@....samsung.com" <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: question about git repos containing selftest.

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 13:34 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Young, David <dayoung@...mai.com> wrote:
> > Thanks, I was definitely looking at the master branch of linux-kselftest.
> >
> > There are still more changes in linux-next repo, should those be considered as "in progress"?
> >
> 
> Patches in linux-kselftest fixes branch are the ones I included in my
> pull request
> I just sent out. linux-next might have some selftest patches that are part of a
> series that depend on a sub-system API. Maybe that is what you are seeing
> in linux-next.

Is there any reason why Andrew isn't handling kselftests? Considering it
spans multiple subsystems, it seems far more appropriate that way.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/