[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141209212708.GL11764@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:27:08 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: anthony.olech.opensource@...semi.com,
support.opensource@...semi.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: da9052-regulator fails to probe in linux-next
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:17:14PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Seem like this issue is not specific to the da9052 regulator.
> On a imx6q-wandboard we can see the internal anatop regulators being
> probed on linux-next 20141031:
> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141031/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html
>
> [ 0.072014] vdd1p1: 800 <--> 1375 mV at 1100 mV
> [ 0.073027] vdd3p0: 2800 <--> 3150 mV at 3000 mV
> [ 0.073933] vdd2p5: 2000 <--> 2750 mV at 2400 mV
> [ 0.074888] vddarm: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV
> [ 0.075935] vddpu: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV
> [ 0.076897] vddsoc: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1200 mV
> ,but since next-20141103 they do not probe anymore:
> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141103/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html
That last log looks *extremely* unhappy in general, I can't actually see
any references to attempts to do regulator things and there's lots of
backtraces in there. AFAICT those regulators are anatop regulators and
I can't find references to that driver or anything called "vdd".
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists