linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/61] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141209044317.GU16827@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:13:17 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Antoine Ténart <antoine@...e-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, lars@...afoo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/61] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities
 retrieval

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:38:53PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:58:43PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> I totally understand your point. And I actually am a bit uncomfortable
> merging this so late too, and I'd actually prefer to have it merged
> for 3.20. But this is a huge patchset, and I'd really like to avoid
> rebasing it forever.
> 
> I'll send a v6, with your patches, as soon as 3.19-rc1 is out. This
> will be my last rebase of this serie. If these patches are not merged
> then, then I will just give up on this cleanup, and probably any
> subsequent ones.
Since I have applied them to a topic branch, I don't think we you to rebase
and resend. Git does a pretty good job at rebasing so I will rebase
this branch on top of -rc1 and merge. Fixes can keep coming on top of this
one.

So these patches are applied, and will show up in -next after -rc1. Thank
you for the work you put in this.

Last night, I thought of giving it a try so temporarily merged this to my
next. SFR found bunch of issues with it (mostly due to dependencies in
users) so lets keep fixing those..

-- 
~Vinod


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)