[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5487D799.5060404@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:18:17 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf mem: perf mem report fails in TUI mode
On 12/9/14 9:15 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running a couple of tests with perf mem from tip.git and
> found that perf mem -t load rep was failing only in TUI mode.
> With --stdio, it works fine. I did a bit of investigation and found
> out that the TUI mode is failing because some symbol (kernel)
> is showing up with a huge (negative) size. I don't understand
> the connection between the TUI vs. tty browser and symbols.
>
> To reproduce:
> $ perf mem -t load rec my_test_program
> $ perf mem -t load rep
> $ perf mem -t load rep --stdio
>
> Debugging with TUI is a pain, so I stopped.
>
> I have a patch to improve perf mem a bit but I'd like to get this problem
> fixed first.
>
> Maybe you have a idea of what's going on.
I usually avoid the TUI by not installing slang-devel.
But, trying out Linus' current tip (a0e4467726c - post 3.18) this seems
to work fine:
perf mem -t load rec ls
perf mem -t load rep
But kernel version for the box is 3.16.6-203.fc20.x86_64.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists