[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141210063628.GB13371@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:36:28 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] enhance compaction success rate
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:16:34AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/08/2014 08:16 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >This patchset aims at increase of compaction success rate. Changes are
> >related to compaction finish condition and freepage isolation condition.
> >
> > From these changes, I did stress highalloc test in mmtests with nonmovable
> >order 7 allocation configuration, and success rate (%) at phase 1 are,
> >
> >Base Patch-1 Patch-3 Patch-4
> >55.00 57.00 62.67 64.00
> >
> >And, compaction success rate (%) on same test are,
> >
> >Base Patch-1 Patch-3 Patch-4
> >18.47 28.94 35.13 41.50
>
> Did you test Patch-2 separately? Any difference to Patch 1?
I didn't test it separately. I guess that there is no remarkable
difference because it just slightly changes page stealing logic, not
compaction logic. Compaction success rate would not be affected by
patch 2, but, I will check it next time.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists