[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141209231537.42052501.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 23:15:37 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>, jslaby@...e.cz,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evan Broder <evan@...oder.net>,
Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Niels de Vos <devos@...oraproject.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] INPUT: Route keyboard LEDs through the generic LEDs
layer.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:01:00 +0100 John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 10/12/2014 02:02, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > This permits to reassign keyboard LEDs to something else than keyboard "leds"
> > state, by adding keyboard led and modifier triggers connected to a series
> > of VT input LEDs, themselves connected to VT input triggers, which
> > per-input device LEDs use by default. Userland can thus easily change the LED
> > behavior of (a priori) all input devices, or of particular input devices.
> >
> > This also permits to fix #7063 from userland by using a modifier to implement
> > proper CapsLock behavior and have the keyboard caps lock led show that modifier
> > state.
> >
> > [ebroder@...afive.com: Rebased to 3.2-rc1 or so, cleaned up some includes, and fixed some constants]
> > [blogic@...nwrt.org: CONFIG_INPUT_LEDS stubs should be static inline]
> > [akpm@...ux-foundation.org: remove unneeded `extern', fix comment layout]
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Broder <evan@...oder.net>
> > Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
> > Tested-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> > Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
> > Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
>
> I am not sure why my SoB was added. I originally sent a trivial fix up
> for a header file as linux-next was not building (this was a year or
> more ago). I never reviewed this patch nor have I tested it and I
> certainly was not involved in the development. the patch simply broke
> the compile of the Mips based Wifi and DSL SoCs that i maitain.
>
> ...
>
> this #else part was added by me to make sure that linux-next was
> building again. this really does not qualify my SoB being added.
>
The SOB is appropriate - you made a change to the code and (presumably)
attached your SOB to that. The change is briefly described there:
> [blogic@...nwrt.org: CONFIG_INPUT_LEDS stubs should be static inline]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists