[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412101102420.13233@nanos>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:25:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Yun Wu (Abel)" <wuyun.wu@...wei.com>
cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/16] genirq: Introduce callback
irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Yun Wu (Abel) wrote:
> On 2014/11/19 19:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I spent last two weeks implementing and testing my original idea about making
> the sub domains generic, based on stacked domain feature. Now it comes real,
> please see the attached patch.
Can you please send patches inline? Attached is a pain to reply to.
> With this patch applied, I think things will get easier.
I don't see what gets easier. It's just another infrastructure which
is painfully similar to MSI.
> This patch (also with several other patches) is tested on Hisilicon ARM64 SoC,
> with non PCI devices capable of message based interrupts. The PCI part is not
> tested because it needs large refactoring work to do. So yes, the testing work
> is not sufficient, but I think the patch is enough to present what I really
> wanted to express. :)
Not really.
If you provide proper patches which make use of it and most important
a proper refactoring of the PCI/MSI side then we can discuss that, but
for now it's just handwaving.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists