| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20141210105209.GA11047@e104805>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:09 +0000
From: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
To: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/9] tracing: Add array printing helpers
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:04:52PM +0000, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:42:10PM +0000, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:04:12 +0000
> > "Javi Merino" <javi.merino@....com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > +
> > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u8, unsigned int, "0x%x");
> > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u16, unsigned int, "0x%x");
> > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u32, unsigned int, "0x%x");
> > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u64, unsigned long long, "0x%llx");
> > > +
> >
> > I would really like to avoid adding a bunch of macros for each type.
> > Can't we have something like this:
> > ftrace_print_array(struct trace_seq *p, void *buf, int buf_len,
> > int size)
> > {
> > char *prefix = "";
> > void *ptr = buf;
> >
> > while (ptr < buf + buf_len) {
> > switch(size) {
> > case 8:
> > trace_seq_printf("%s0x%x", prefix,
> > *(unsigned char *)ptr);
>
> I think this should be *(u8 *) etc.
Done, see below.
> Otherwise, I don't have a problem with this approach. It's less
> ugly than my original.
It makes the lib traceevent patches uglier though ;)
> > break;
> > case 16:
> > trace_seq_printf("%s0x%x", prefix,
> > *(unsigned short *)ptr);
> > break;
> > case 32:
> > trace_seq_printf("%s0x%x", prefix,
> > *(unsigned int *)ptr);
> > break;
> > case 64:
> > trace_seq_printf("%s0x%llx", prefix,
> > *(unsigned long long *)ptr);
> > break;
> > default:
> > BUG();
> > }
> > prefix = ",";
> > ptr += size;
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > We probably could even make the "BUG()" into a build bug, with a little
> > work.
>
> That sounds possible.
The only way I can think of doing that is by moving the check to the
__print_array macro:
#define __print_array(array, count, el_size) \
({ \
BUILD_BUG_ON(el_size != 8 && el_size != 16 && el_size != 32 && el_size != 64); \
ftrace_print_array_seq(p, array, count, el_size); \
})
Is this what you have in mind?
> Javi?
What about this?
diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
index 28672e87e910..d5bddb230ecd 100644
--- a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ const char *ftrace_print_bitmask_seq(struct trace_seq *p, void *bitmask_ptr,
const char *ftrace_print_hex_seq(struct trace_seq *p,
const unsigned char *buf, int len);
+const char *ftrace_print_array_seq(struct trace_seq *p,
+ const void *buf, int buf_len, size_t el_size);
+
struct trace_iterator;
struct trace_event;
diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
index 26b4f2e13275..38c5f91f63da 100644
--- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
+++ b/include/trace/ftrace.h
@@ -263,6 +263,10 @@
#undef __print_hex
#define __print_hex(buf, buf_len) ftrace_print_hex_seq(p, buf, buf_len)
+#undef __print_array
+#define __print_array(array, count, el_size) \
+ ftrace_print_array_seq(p, array, count, el_size)
+
#undef DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS
#define DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(call, proto, args, tstruct, assign, print) \
static notrace enum print_line_t \
@@ -676,6 +680,7 @@ static inline void ftrace_test_probe_##call(void) \
#undef __get_dynamic_array_len
#undef __get_str
#undef __get_bitmask
+#undef __print_array
#undef TP_printk
#define TP_printk(fmt, args...) "\"" fmt "\", " __stringify(args)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
index c6977d5a9b12..b582261086e8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -186,6 +186,48 @@ ftrace_print_hex_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const unsigned char *buf, int buf_len)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ftrace_print_hex_seq);
+const char *
+ftrace_print_array_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const void *buf, int buf_len,
+ size_t el_size)
+{
+ const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p);
+ const char *prefix = "";
+ void *ptr = (void *)buf;
+
+ trace_seq_putc(p, '{');
+
+ while (ptr < buf + buf_len) {
+ switch(el_size) {
+ case 8:
+ trace_seq_printf(p, "%s0x%x", prefix,
+ *(u8 *)ptr);
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ trace_seq_printf(p, "%s0x%x", prefix,
+ *(u16 *)ptr);
+ break;
+ case 32:
+ trace_seq_printf(p, "%s0x%x", prefix,
+ *(u32 *)ptr);
+ break;
+ case 64:
+ trace_seq_printf(p, "%s0x%llx", prefix,
+ *(u64 *)ptr);
+ break;
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ }
+ prefix = ",";
+ ptr += el_size / 8;
+ }
+
+ trace_seq_putc(p, '}');
+ trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ftrace_print_array_seq);
+
int ftrace_raw_output_prep(struct trace_iterator *iter,
struct trace_event *trace_event)
{
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists