[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141210002619.GB516@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:26:19 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
peterz@...radead.org, bp@...e.de, jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] CPU hotplug: active_writer not woken up in some
cases - deadlock
On 12/09, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Would wait_event()/wake_up() work for the wakeup-writer case?
Yes, and in this case we could probably kill this puts_pending logic
and avoid cpu_hotplug.lock in put_online_cpus() altogether? Can't we
just make cpu_hotplug.refcount atomic_t?
Anyway, this makes me think again that this code should use percpu_rwsem.
Perhaps I'll try to make a patch next week...
(we need down_write_recursive_readers(), and probably rcusync patches).
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists