[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141210134223.GE21108@debian>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:42:24 +0000
From: Joe Thornber <thornber@...hat.com>
To: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
Cc: ejt@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
snitzer@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] staging: writeboost: Add dm-writeboost
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:31:31PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
> Joe,
>
> > So you copy the bio payload to a different block of ram and then
> > complete the bio? Or does the rambuf refer to the bio payload
> > directly?
> Good question.
> The answer is, copy the data (got by bio_data(bio)) to rambuf once
> and ack if it's not barrier things.
> It would be nice if data in rambuf points to bio payload but it now copies
> because bio payload can be reused after completion. Am I right?
> Is there a way of eliminate memory copying?
You *have* to eliminate this memory copying. Remap the bios to the
relevant portion of your log, and don't complete them until you log
chunk is coherent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists