lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:42:24 +0000
From:	Joe Thornber <thornber@...hat.com>
To:	Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
Cc:	ejt@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	snitzer@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] staging: writeboost: Add dm-writeboost

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:31:31PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
> Joe,
> 
> > So you copy the bio payload to a different block of ram and then
> > complete the bio?  Or does the rambuf refer to the bio payload
> > directly?
> Good question.
> The answer is, copy the data (got by bio_data(bio)) to rambuf once
> and ack if it's not barrier things.
> It would be nice if data in rambuf points to bio payload but it now copies
> because bio payload can be reused after completion. Am I right?
> Is there a way of eliminate memory copying?

You *have* to eliminate this memory copying.  Remap the bios to the
relevant portion of your log, and don't complete them until you log
chunk is coherent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ