linux-kernel - [PATCH 12/12] percpu: use {cpu|node}mask pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:54 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] percpu: use {cpu|node}mask pr_cont and seq output functions

Convert the existing user of cpu{mask|list}_scnprintf() and
node{mask|list}_scnprintf() which use them just to printk or
seq_printf() the resulting buffer to use the following functions
instead respectively.

* For printk: cpu{mask|list}_pr_cont() and node{mask|list}_pr_cont().

* For seq_file: seq_cpumask[_list]() and seq_nodemask[_list]().

Because these conversions usually break up a single output function
call into multiple, the reduction is LOC isn't too big but it removes
unnecessary complexity and/or arbitrary limit on the length printed.

This patch is dependent on the previous patch ("bitmap, cpumask,
nodemask: implement pr_cont variants of formatting functions") which
is planned to go through -mm.  It'd be the easiest to route this
together.  If this should go through the subsystem tree, please wait
till the forementioned patch is merged to mainline.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/percpu.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index d39e2f4..3ff9b75 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1528,7 +1528,6 @@ static void pcpu_dump_alloc_info(const char *lvl,
 int __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
 				  void *base_addr)
 {
-	static char cpus_buf[4096] __initdata;
 	static int smap[PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SLOTS] __initdata;
 	static int dmap[PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SLOTS] __initdata;
 	size_t dyn_size = ai->dyn_size;
@@ -1541,12 +1540,12 @@ int __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
 	int *unit_map;
 	int group, unit, i;

-	cpumask_scnprintf(cpus_buf, sizeof(cpus_buf), cpu_possible_mask);
-
 #define PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(cond)	do {					\
 	if (unlikely(cond)) {						\
 		pr_emerg("PERCPU: failed to initialize, %s", #cond);	\
-		pr_emerg("PERCPU: cpu_possible_mask=%s\n", cpus_buf);	\
+		pr_emerg("PERCPU: cpu_possible_mask=");			\
+		cpumask_pr_cont(cpu_possible_mask);			\
+		pr_cont("\n");						\
 		pcpu_dump_alloc_info(KERN_EMERG, ai);			\
 		BUG();							\
 	}								\
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/