[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141210015421.GB3370@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:54:21 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de, lftan@...era.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.horizon.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/nios2 for v3.19
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:06:38PM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
>
> (Preserving the signed annotated tag object itself is another
> intriguing possibility, but not only is it a huge format change
> to create a way for a commit to point to a tag, but I also don't
> see how to avoid tag name collision problems.)
Actually, git already preserves the signed annotated tag. That's the
only way git show --show-signature can verify the tag's gpg signature.
You can see original signed annotated tag via a command like this:
git cat-file -p 18b34d9a7a085ba8f9cafa6a0d002e2cbac87c1f
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists