lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5488C478.9000209@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:08:56 -0500
From:	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To:	JBottomley@...allels.com
CC:	steven@...ulo.com,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [v3.16][v3.17][v3.18][ Regression]  scsi: handle flush errors properly

Hello James,

A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0].  After a kernel
bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:

commit 89fb4cd1f717a871ef79fa7debbe840e3225cd54
Author: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 3 19:17:34 2014 +0200

    scsi: handle flush errors properly

The regression was introduced as of v3.16 and still exits in the 3.18
kernel.  It has also made it's way into the stable kernels.

I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
or would it be best to submit a revert request?


Thanks,

Joe

[0] http://pad.lv/1366538

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ