[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5487BBE0.4000701@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:20:00 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: mach-bcm: Enable I2C support for iProc
On 09/12/14 18:24, Ray Jui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/2014 6:20 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 09/12/14 18:18, Ray Jui wrote:
>>> Enable I2C driver support for Broadcom iProc family of SoCs by
>>> selecting I2C_BCM_IPROC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>> index aaeec78..86ee90b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>>> select ARM_AMBA
>>> select PINCTRL
>>> + select I2C_BCM_IPROC
>>
>> One way to avoid having to modify mach-bcm/Kconfig would be to have your
>> i2c driver Kconfig do this:
>>
>> default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>
>> would that work?
>>
> Yes. So in which case it is better to select a driver from the
> architecture specific Kconfig?
I suppose if your driver/subsystem is critical for system boot, like
powering a regulator or something that has a critical purpose, a select
is probably more appropriate here. If this is just exposing non-critical
devices, I would go with a depends on/default at the driver Kconfig level.
This is just how I see things, others would definitively have a
different view.
>
>>> help
>>> This enables support for systems based on Broadcom IPROC
>>> architected SoCs.
>>> The IPROC complex contains one or more ARM CPUs along with
>>> common
>>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists