linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: balloon: Fix the deadlock issue in the memory hot-add code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB07118CFD9B32FEBE4E0C9921A0630@BY2PR0301MB0711.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:21:09 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: balloon: Fix the deadlock issue in the
 memory hot-add code



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Hocko [mailto:mhocko@...e.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 2:56 AM
> To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> apw@...onical.com; linux-mm@...ck.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: balloon: Fix the deadlock issue in the
> memory hot-add code
> 
> On Tue 09-12-14 19:25:50, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > (2014/12/09 18:08), Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > >Doesn't udev retry the operation if it gets EBUSY or EAGAIN?
> >
> > It depend on implementation of udev.rules. So we can retry
> > online/offline operation in udev.rules.
> [...]
> 
> # Memory hotadd request
> SUBSYSTEM=="memory", ACTION=="add",
> DEVPATH=="/devices/system/memory/memory*[0-9]",
> TEST=="/sys$devpath/state", RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'echo online >
> /sys$devpath/state'"
> 
> OK so this is not prepared for a temporary failures and retries.
> 
> > >And again, why cannot we simply make the onlining fail or try_lock
> > >and retry internally if the event consumer cannot cope with errors?
> >
> > Did you mean the following Srinivasan's first patch looks good to you?
> >   https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/662
> 
> Heh, I was just about to post this. Because I haven't noticed the previous
> patch yet. Yeah, Something like that. Except that I would expect EAGAIN or
> EBUSY rather than ERESTARTSYS which should never leak into userspace. And
> that would happen here AFAICS because signal_pending will not be true
> usually.
Michal,

I agree that the fix to this problem must be outside the clients of  add_memory() and that
is the reason I had sent that patch:  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/662. Let me know if
you want me to resend this patch with the correct return value.

Regards,

K. Y
> 
> So there are two options. Either make the udev rule more robust and retry
> within RUN section or do the retry withing online_pages (try_lock and go into
> interruptible sleep which gets signaled by finished add_memory()). The later
> option is safer wrt. the userspace because the operation wouldn't fail
> unexpectedly.
> Another option would be generating the sysfs file after all the internal
> initialization is done and call it outside of the memory hotplug lock.
> 
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/