linux-kernel - [PATCH 8/8] s390/kvm: REPLACE barrier fixup with READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1418306712-17245-9-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:05:11 +0100
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] s390/kvm: REPLACE barrier fixup with READ_ONCE

ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)

Commit 1365039d0cb3 ("KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking") replace
ACCESS_ONCE with barriers. Lets use READ_ONCE instead.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index 6dc0ad9..8f195fa 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -229,12 +229,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		goto out;
 	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
 	do {
-		old = *ic;
-		barrier();
+		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		while (old.k) {
 			cond_resched();
-			old = *ic;
-			barrier();
+			old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		}
 		new = old;
 		new.k = 1;
@@ -253,8 +251,7 @@ static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		goto out;
 	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
 	do {
-		old = *ic;
-		barrier();
+		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		new = old;
 		new.k = 0;
 	} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
@@ -269,12 +266,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
 	do {
-		old = *ic;
-		barrier();
+		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		while (old.kg) {
 			cond_resched();
-			old = *ic;
-			barrier();
+			old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		}
 		new = old;
 		new.k = 1;
@@ -288,8 +283,7 @@ static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
 	do {
-		old = *ic;
-		barrier();
+		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		new = old;
 		new.kh--;
 		if (!new.kh)
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/