[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U4RFYx9NXOACrXJZK2bKkosyYnmTZRHkXuaSz-FS9kNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:09:13 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: core: Support trying to get close to a
certain voltage
Mark,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> This is just an implementation detail, everything you're saying here
> applies equally to any user specifying by tolerance rather than range.
> If the reason for doing this is to fix that problem then a new API isn't
> the way to go about it.
OK, I'll give a shot at taking my code and using it as a new
implementation for regulator_set_voltage_tol(). In the SD card code
I'll pick some reasonable tolerances--they won't be exactly what the
spec says, but they ought to be good enough. If Ulf comes back and
yells at me then we can revisit adding a new API.
Thanks!
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists