linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vfs.git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:34:56 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vfs.git

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 06:06:24PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Check the remaining users of ->f_path.dentry.  I agree that they ought to
> be encapsulated into a sane set of helpers - raw access to ->f_path in
> filesystems is asking for serious trouble.  And we have very few such places
> remaining.

Sloppy writing: insert "with the exception of filesystems that are not
going to be suitable for any form of stacking" - there _is_ a bunch of
debugfs, configfs, kernfs places using that.  They'd also better be
taken care of, but it's an independent story; for overlayfs/unionmount/etc.
purposes they are non-issue.

BTW, there are several places where ->f_path.mnt access is the right thing
to do - in autofs.  Also a non-issue here...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/