[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141211104119.A482.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:41:19 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix scripts/headers.sh to see the correct Kbuild path
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:58:33 +0100
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> Masahiro,
>
> On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 15:52 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > The exported headers were moved to "uapi" directories.
> > We should check the existence of arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
> > ---
>
> Does this patch fix any problems? If so, which?
I am fixing a wrong code.
Actually, the "um" architecture does not support headers install.
arch/um/include/asm/Kbuild exists
arch/um/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild does not exist
Checking arch/*/include/asm/Kbuild does not work.
Moreover, the top Makefile is checking arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild
headers_install: __headers
$(if $(wildcard $(srctree)/arch/$(hdr-arch)/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild),, \
$(error Headers not exportable for the $(SRCARCH) architecture))
> And why did no one
> notice these problems before? Perhaps the commit explanation could
> mention that.
You will notice the code below:
for arch in ${archs}; do
case ${arch} in
um) # no userspace export
;;
"um" has already been omitted and it never reaches do_command().
That is why nobody has noticed this issue.
Uh, OK, we do not need double-checking.
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists