[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548A122C.8000906@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:52:44 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
On 12/11/2014 04:49 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > So either one of those 'good's actually wasn't, or I'm just cursed.
> Even if there was a good that wasn't, that last "bad" (6f929b4e5a02)
> is already sufficient just on its own to say that likely v3.16 already
> had the problem.
>
> Just do
>
> gitk v3.16..6f929b4e5a02
>
> and cry.
>
> (or "git diff --stat -M v3.16...6f929b4e5a02" to see what that commit
> brought in from the common ancestor).
>
> So I'd call that bisect a failure, and your "v3.16 is fine" is
> actually suspect after all. Which *might* mean that it's some hardware
> issue after all. Or there are multiple different problems, and while
> v3.16 was fine, the problem was introduced earlier (in the common
> ancestor of that staging tree), then fixed for 3.16, and then
> re-introduced later again.
Is it possible that Dave and myself were seeing the same problem after
all?
I'll go bisect it even further back...
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists