linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:32:53 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:45:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) failed like this:

> diff --git a/fs/nsfs.c b/fs/nsfs.c
> index 0791d086804d..7d98db03c2ce 100644
> --- a/fs/nsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nsfs.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/proc_ns.h>
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h>

Umm...  Either it's time.h + timekeeping.h or ktime.h alone - ktime.h
pulls timekeeping.h and time.h.  For now I went with the latter variant.
However, I wonder if longer term it would be better to provide a variant
of new_inode_pseudo() that would set the timestamps that way - only two
callers (new_inode() and sock_alloc()) do not do exactly that.  Oh, well -
that can wait...

For now, fixed and force-pushed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/