linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <548908C2.1060906@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:18 +0530
From:	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
To:	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, thomas.ab@...sung.com,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support

Hi Yadwinder,

On Thursday 04 December 2014 11:56 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> Hi Pankaj,
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com
> <mailto:pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>> wrote:
>
>     Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs
>     and SoC revisions. This patch intendes to provide initialization
>     code for all these functionalites, at the same time it provides some
>     sysfs entries for accessing these information to userspace.
>
>     This driver usese existing binding for exnos-chipid.
>
> [ ... ]
>
>     +
>     +static unsigned int soc_product_id;
>     +static unsigned int soc_revision;
>     +
>     +int exynos_product_id(void)
>     +{
>     +       return soc_product_id;
>     +}
>     +EXPORT_SYMBOL(exynos_product_id);
>     +
>     +int exynos_revision(void)
>     +{
>     +       return soc_revision;
>     +}
>     +EXPORT_SYMBOL(exynos_revision);
>     +
>
>
> How about exporting only a struct containing members : soc_revision,
> soc_product_id

OK, keeping in mind that chipid driver might be used from other drivers 
as well (such as asv) other than from mach-exynos, we can do this.

> and may be some more like asv/fused_info  and keeping these function as

Other members such as fused_info etc. can be added as and when required. 
As of now there is no active user of all those.

> inlines ?
>
>     +static const char *exynos_product_id_to_name(unsigned int product_id)
>
>
> __init ?   hmm .. I think almost whole driver other than __ATTR funcs.
>

OK, I'll take care of this in next patch version.

> Otherwise it looks nice to me :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Yadwinder


Thanks for review.

Pankaj Dubey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/