lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:35:13 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Konopko <kris@...agma.com>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723au: Fix sparse warnings

On 12/12/14 00:53, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/11/2014 04:23 PM, Krzysztof Konopko wrote:
>> Some struct fields in wifi.h are meant to be __le16 bu were declared as
>> unsigned short.  This was reported by sparse:
>>
>>    rtw_wlan_util.c:538:24: warning: cast to restricted __le16
>>    rtw_wlan_util.c:1544:29: warning: cast to restricted __le16
>>    rtw_wlan_util.c:1546:25: warning: cast to restricted __le16
>>
>> This patch changes declared types of the struct fields involved.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Konopko <kris@...agma.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/wifi.h | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/wifi.h
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/wifi.h
>> index fd3da3b..8a2adc5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/wifi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/wifi.h
>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>>   struct AC_param {
>>       unsigned char        ACI_AIFSN;
>>       unsigned char        CW;
>> -    unsigned short    TXOP_limit;
>> +    __le16            TXOP_limit;
>>   }  __packed;
>>
>>   struct WMM_para_element {
>> @@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ struct WMM_para_element {
>>
>>   struct ADDBA_request {
>>       unsigned char        dialog_token;
>> -    unsigned short    BA_para_set;
>> +    __le16        BA_para_set;
>>       unsigned short    BA_timeout_value;
>> -    unsigned short    BA_starting_seqctrl;
>> +    __le16        BA_starting_seqctrl;
>>   }  __packed;
> 
> This fix may make the sparse warnings go away, but I think it introduces
> new bugs.

Right, I see.  Nice try though, isn't it? ;)

> In particular, did you test on big-endian hardware after you
> made this change?

Nope.  I don't have any big-endian hardware.  I don't even have the
wireless card TBH.  But I'm happy to try to get one.  Is Rtl8723AE the
right model?

> I recently found that the driver for RTL8188EU needed
> to have BA_para_set to unsigned short, and the endianess warnings needed
> to be fixed in the code. Then it would work on my PowerBook G4 with a
> PPC processor.
> 

OK.  Does it still work with little endian?

> In RTL8188EU, both BA_starting_seqctrl and TXOP_limit are unsigned short.
> 

That's not quite the case.  `TXOP_limit` is __le16 in RTL8188EU [1].
It's __le16 even in your GitHub repo [2].  And that made me thinking
that there's probably some inconsistency in the header.

I'm _far_ from being a wireless expert but doesn't data coming out of
the wire/air have the endianess defined explicitly?  And both `AC_param`
and `ADDBA_request` come out of air?

I was hunting particularly for inconsistencies with `sparse` and came
across this one.  But I dug a bit further and I wonder why the driver is
not using standard stuff like the one in `include/linux/ieee80211.h`
where any data wider than one byte is clearly declared as __le<nn>?

Cheers,
Kris

--

[1] drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h as of next-20141211
[2] https://github.com/lwfinger/rtl8188eu/blob/master/include/wifi.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ