[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:59:20 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI and power management updates for 3.19-rc1
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Also the ACPI core is now going to support the _DEP configuration
> information in a limited way.
Hmm. That seems to be the cause of this annoying new message:
...
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
PCI: Using host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary, use
"pci=nocrs" and report a bug
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:00: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:01: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:02: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:03: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:04: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:05: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:06: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
acpi LNXCPU:07: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb840)
acpi device:27: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb840)
acpi device:3f: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb8c0)
acpi LNXVIDEO:00: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
ACPI: Power Resource [FN00] (off)
...
which doesn't seem to hinder anything from working, but is extremely
annoying because it's printed out as some super-important "KERN_ERR
message of Doom!"
I don't see why incomplete ACPI tables would *ever* be "KERN_ERR"
level messages, but I particularly don't see it when it seems to be
our own meaningless fake entries.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists