lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:59:20 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI and power management updates for 3.19-rc1

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Also the ACPI core is now going to support the _DEP configuration
> information in a limited way.

Hmm. That seems to be the cause of this annoying new message:

    ...
    ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
    PCI: Using host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary, use
"pci=nocrs" and report a bug
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:00: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:01: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:02: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:03: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:04: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:05: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:06: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb200)
    acpi LNXCPU:07: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb840)
    acpi device:27: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb840)
    acpi device:3f: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: [Package] has zero elements (ffff88040ccdb8c0)
    acpi LNXVIDEO:00: Failed to evaluate _DEP.
    ACPI: Power Resource [FN00] (off)
    ...

which doesn't seem to hinder anything from working, but is extremely
annoying because it's printed out as some super-important "KERN_ERR
message of Doom!"

I don't see why incomplete ACPI tables would *ever* be "KERN_ERR"
level messages, but I particularly don't see it when it seems to be
our own meaningless fake entries.

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ