| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <548C6B72.5080302@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 01:38:10 +0900
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: handle change in cpu-node relationship.
Although workqueue detects relationship between cpu<->node at boot,
it is finally determined in cpu_up().
This patch tries to update pool->node using online status of cpus.
1. When a node goes down, clear per-cpu pool's node attr.
2. When a cpu comes up, update per-cpu pool's node attr.
3. When a cpu comes up, update possinle node cpumask workqueue is using for sched.
4. Detect the best node for unbound pool's cpumask using the latest info.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 07b4eb5..259b3ba 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
- /* possible CPUs of each node */
+ /* possible CPUs of each node initialized with possible info at boot.
+ but modified at cpu hotplug to be adjusted to real info. */
static bool wq_disable_numa;
module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
@@ -3449,6 +3450,31 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
}
+/*
+ * detect best node for given cpumask.
+ */
+static int pool_detect_best_node(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
+{
+ int node, best, match, selected;
+ static struct cpumask andmask; /* we're under mutex */
+
+ /* Is any node okay ? */
+ if (!wq_numa_enabled ||
+ cpumask_subset(cpu_online_mask, cpumask))
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ best = 0;
+ selected = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ /* select a node which contains the most cpu of cpumask */
+ for_each_node_state(node, N_ONLINE) {
+ cpumask_and(&andmask, cpumask, cpumask_of_node(node));
+ match = cpumask_weight(&andmask);
+ if (match > best)
+ selected = node;
+ }
+ return selected;
+}
+
+
/**
* get_unbound_pool - get a worker_pool with the specified attributes
* @attrs: the attributes of the worker_pool to get
@@ -3467,7 +3493,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
u32 hash = wqattrs_hash(attrs);
struct worker_pool *pool;
- int node;
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -3492,17 +3517,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
* 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
*/
pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
-
- /* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
- if (wq_numa_enabled) {
- for_each_node(node) {
- if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
- wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
- pool->node = node;
- break;
- }
- }
- }
+ pool->node = pool_detect_best_node(pool->attrs->cpumask);
if (worker_pool_assign_id(pool) < 0)
goto fail;
@@ -4567,7 +4582,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
- int pi;
+ int pi, node;
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
@@ -4583,6 +4598,16 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
case CPU_ONLINE:
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ /* now cpu <-> node info is established, update the info. */
+ if (!wq_disable_numa) {
+ for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu,
+ wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
+ node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
+ }
+ for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
+ pool->node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
@@ -4951,7 +4976,21 @@ void workqueue_register_numanode(int nid)
void workqueue_unregister_numanode(int nid)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
+ const struct cpumask *nodecpumask;
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+ int cpu;
+ /* at this point, cpu-to-node relationship is not lost */
+ nodecpumask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, nodecpumask) {
+ /*
+ * pool is allcated at boot and assumed to be persistent,
+ * we cannot free this.
+ * Update to be NUMA_NO_NODE. This will be fixed at ONLINE
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
+ pool->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ }
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
wq_release_unbound_numa(wq, nid);
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists