[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141213082751.GA1526@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:27:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Something that's still making me wonder if it's some kind of
> > > hardware problem is the non-deterministic nature of this bug.
> >
> > I'd expect it to be a race condition, though. Which can easily
> > cause these kinds of issues, and the timing will be pretty
> > random even if the load is very regular.
> >
> > And we know that the scheduler has an integer overflow under
> > Sasha's loads, although I didn't hear anything from Ingo and
> > friends about it. Ingo/Peter, you were cc'd on that report,
> > where at least one of the multiplcations in wake_affine() ended
> > up overflowing..
>
> Just to make sure, is there any other wake_affine report other
> than the one in this thread? (I tried a wake_affine full text
> search on my inbox and didn't find anything that appeared
> relevant.)
Found the report from Sasha:
sched: odd values for effective load calculations
right?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists