linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.17 30/47] Fix race condition between vxlan_sock_add and vxlan_sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141214201819.658450125@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:21:05 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.17 30/47] Fix race condition between vxlan_sock_add and vxlan_sock_release

3.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 00c83b01d58068dfeb2e1351cca6fccf2a83fa8f ]

Currently, when trying to reuse a socket, vxlan_sock_add will grab
vn->sock_lock, locate a reusable socket, inc refcount and release
vn->sock_lock.

But vxlan_sock_release() will first decrement refcount, and then grab
that lock. refcnt operations are atomic but as currently we have
deferred works which hold vs->refcnt each, this might happen, leading to
a use after free (specially after vxlan_igmp_leave):

  CPU 1                            CPU 2

deferred work                    vxlan_sock_add
  ...                              ...
                                   spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock)
                                   vs = vxlan_find_sock();
  vxlan_sock_release
    dec vs->refcnt, reaches 0
    spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock)
                                   vxlan_sock_hold(vs), refcnt=1
                                   spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock)
    hlist_del_rcu(&vs->hlist);
    vxlan_notify_del_rx_port(vs)
    spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock)

So when we look for a reusable socket, we check if it wasn't freed
already before reusing it.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Fixes: 7c47cedf43a8b3 ("vxlan: move IGMP join/leave to work queue")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan.c |   10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2050,9 +2050,8 @@ static int vxlan_init(struct net_device
 	spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock);
 	vs = vxlan_find_sock(vxlan->net, ipv6 ? AF_INET6 : AF_INET,
 			     vxlan->dst_port);
-	if (vs) {
+	if (vs && atomic_add_unless(&vs->refcnt, 1, 0)) {
 		/* If we have a socket with same port already, reuse it */
-		atomic_inc(&vs->refcnt);
 		vxlan_vs_add_dev(vs, vxlan);
 	} else {
 		/* otherwise make new socket outside of RTNL */
@@ -2459,12 +2458,9 @@ struct vxlan_sock *vxlan_sock_add(struct
 
 	spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock);
 	vs = vxlan_find_sock(net, ipv6 ? AF_INET6 : AF_INET, port);
-	if (vs) {
-		if (vs->rcv == rcv)
-			atomic_inc(&vs->refcnt);
-		else
+	if (vs && ((vs->rcv != rcv) ||
+		   !atomic_add_unless(&vs->refcnt, 1, 0)))
 			vs = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
-	}
 	spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock);
 
 	if (!vs)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/