[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141214201818.781357387@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:20:42 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.17 07/47] slab: fix nodeid bounds check for non-contiguous node IDs
3.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
commit 7c3fbbdd04a681a1992ad6a3d7a36a63ff668753 upstream.
The bounds check for nodeid in ____cache_alloc_node gives false
positives on machines where the node IDs are not contiguous, leading to
a panic at boot time. For example, on a POWER8 machine the node IDs are
typically 0, 1, 16 and 17. This means that num_online_nodes() returns
4, so when ____cache_alloc_node is called with nodeid = 16 the VM_BUG_ON
triggers, like this:
kernel BUG at /home/paulus/kernel/kvm/mm/slab.c:3079!
Call Trace:
.____cache_alloc_node+0x5c/0x270 (unreliable)
.kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0xdc/0x360
.init_list+0x3c/0x128
.kmem_cache_init+0x1dc/0x258
.start_kernel+0x2a0/0x568
start_here_common+0x20/0xa8
To fix this, we instead compare the nodeid with MAX_NUMNODES, and
additionally make sure it isn't negative (since nodeid is an int). The
check is there mainly to protect the array dereference in the get_node()
call in the next line, and the array being dereferenced is of size
MAX_NUMNODES. If the nodeid is in range but invalid (for example if the
node is off-line), the BUG_ON in the next line will catch that.
Fixes: 14e50c6a9bc2 ("mm: slab: Verify the nodeid passed to ____cache_alloc_node")
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/slab.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ static void *____cache_alloc_node(struct
void *obj;
int x;
- VM_BUG_ON(nodeid > num_online_nodes());
+ VM_BUG_ON(nodeid < 0 || nodeid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
n = get_node(cachep, nodeid);
BUG_ON(!n);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists