[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141214230445.7caf202b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:04:45 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
Hi Andy,
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 23:26:36 -0800 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2014 10:58 PM, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > The luto-misc tree seems to have a whole series of commits in it that
> > have just bee removed from the rcu tree ... You really have to be very
> > careful if you base your work on a tree that is regularly rebased.
>
> Hmm. They were there a couple days ago. Paul, what should I do about
> this? I only need the one NMI nesting change for the stuff in
> luto/next.
One of them was causing a problem and (I think) the rest were for v3.20
and so Paul reset his tree.
> > I also wonder if the other commits in that tree are destined for
> > v3.19? If they are for v3.20, then they should not be in linux-next
> > until after v3.19-rc1 has been released.
>
> They're for 3.20. I'll drop the whole series from the next branch for now.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists