| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <548E4388.5090308@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:12:24 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: handle change in cpu-node relationship.
On 12/14/2014 12:38 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> Although workqueue detects relationship between cpu<->node at boot,
> it is finally determined in cpu_up().
> This patch tries to update pool->node using online status of cpus.
>
> 1. When a node goes down, clear per-cpu pool's node attr.
> 2. When a cpu comes up, update per-cpu pool's node attr.
> 3. When a cpu comes up, update possinle node cpumask workqueue is using for sched.
> 4. Detect the best node for unbound pool's cpumask using the latest info.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 07b4eb5..259b3ba 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
> static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
>
> static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
> - /* possible CPUs of each node */
> + /* possible CPUs of each node initialized with possible info at boot.
> + but modified at cpu hotplug to be adjusted to real info. */
>
> static bool wq_disable_numa;
> module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
> @@ -3449,6 +3450,31 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
> call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * detect best node for given cpumask.
> + */
> +static int pool_detect_best_node(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
> +{
> + int node, best, match, selected;
> + static struct cpumask andmask; /* we're under mutex */
> +
> + /* Is any node okay ? */
> + if (!wq_numa_enabled ||
> + cpumask_subset(cpu_online_mask, cpumask))
> + return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> + best = 0;
> + selected = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> + /* select a node which contains the most cpu of cpumask */
> + for_each_node_state(node, N_ONLINE) {
> + cpumask_and(&andmask, cpumask, cpumask_of_node(node));
> + match = cpumask_weight(&andmask);
> + if (match > best)
> + selected = node;
> + }
> + return selected;
> +}
> +
> +
> /**
> * get_unbound_pool - get a worker_pool with the specified attributes
> * @attrs: the attributes of the worker_pool to get
> @@ -3467,7 +3493,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> {
> u32 hash = wqattrs_hash(attrs);
> struct worker_pool *pool;
> - int node;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
>
> @@ -3492,17 +3517,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
> */
> pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
> -
> - /* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
> - if (wq_numa_enabled) {
> - for_each_node(node) {
> - if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
> - wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
> - pool->node = node;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> + pool->node = pool_detect_best_node(pool->attrs->cpumask);
>
> if (worker_pool_assign_id(pool) < 0)
> goto fail;
> @@ -4567,7 +4582,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> struct worker_pool *pool;
> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> - int pi;
> + int pi, node;
>
> switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> @@ -4583,6 +4598,16 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> case CPU_ONLINE:
> mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
>
> + /* now cpu <-> node info is established, update the info. */
> + if (!wq_disable_numa) {
> + for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu,
> + wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
The wq code try to reuse the origin pwqs/pools when the node still have cpu online.
these 3 lines of code will cause the origin pwqs/pools be on the road of dying, and
create a new set of pwqs/pools.
> + node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
> + }
> + for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
> + pool->node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
> mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
>
> @@ -4951,7 +4976,21 @@ void workqueue_register_numanode(int nid)
> void workqueue_unregister_numanode(int nid)
> {
> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> + const struct cpumask *nodecpumask;
> + struct worker_pool *pool;
> + int cpu;
>
> + /* at this point, cpu-to-node relationship is not lost */
> + nodecpumask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, nodecpumask) {
> + /*
> + * pool is allcated at boot and assumed to be persistent,
> + * we cannot free this.
> + * Update to be NUMA_NO_NODE. This will be fixed at ONLINE
> + */
> + for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
> + pool->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
> wq_release_unbound_numa(wq, nid);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists