linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Add ST's Low Power Controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5276146.VV460E9Y1P@wuerfel>
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:06:50 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, wim@...ana.be,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Add ST's Low Power Controller driver

On Monday 15 December 2014 13:50:52 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't think it's necessary to have the MFD node if only one of the
> > two modes can be used based on a DT property. It should be enough
> > to have both the rtc and the wdt driver list the same compatible
> > string and check the property in the probe function to decide if
> > they want to drive the device or not:
> 
> I tried that and it didn't work.  Only one driver probed.
> 
> 

Strange, the code in really_probe() and the comment in device_attach()
suggest that this is not the intentional behavior. What error
code did you return? If it's -ENODEV or -ENXIO, it should keep
trying the other drivers, otherwise it will give up.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/