linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] net: Support for switch port configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C4896FB061E7DE4AAC93031BDCA044B104AC5DCF@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:29:12 +0000
From:	"Varlese, Marco" <marco.varlese@...el.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC:	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	"Fastabend, John R" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	"roopa@...ulusnetworks.com" <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	"sfeldma@...il.com" <sfeldma@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] net: Support for switch port
 configuration

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Graf [mailto:tgr@...radead.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Graf
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 2:08 PM
> To: Varlese, Marco
> Cc: John Fastabend; Jiri Pirko; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> stephen@...workplumber.org; Fastabend, John R;
> roopa@...ulusnetworks.com; sfeldma@...il.com; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
> 
> On 12/11/14 at 09:59am, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> > An example of attributes are:
> > * enabling/disabling of learning of source addresses on a given port
> > (you can imagine the attribute called LEARNING for example);
> > * internal loopback control (i.e. LOOPBACK) which will control how the
> > flow of traffic behaves from the switch fabric towards an egress port;
> > * flooding for broadcast/multicast/unicast type of packets (i.e.
> > BFLOODING, MFLOODING, UFLOODING);
> 
> All of these are highly generic and should *not* be passed through from user
> space to the driver directly but rather be properly abstracted as Roopa
> proposed. The value of this API is abstraction.
How would you let the user enable/disable features then? For instance, how would the user enable/disable flooding for broadcast packets (BFLOODING) on a given port? What I was proposing is to have a list of attributes (to be added in if_link.h) which can be tuned by the user using a tool like iproute2. What do you propose? 
I think I have seen Roopa posting his updated ndo patch and getting some feedback by few people already and as long as I will be able to accomplish the use case described here I am happy with his way.

> If we introduce per device attributes for generic functions we lose large
> portions of the value gained.
> You mentioned you have additional attributes in mind, maybe you can give a
> few examples which are not generic, i.e. do not apply to multiple vendors.
I do not have an example right now of a vendor specific attribute but I was just saying that might happen (i.e. someone will have a feature not implemented by others?).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/