linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [CIFS] Fix signed/unsigned pointer warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH2r5mucwo_FH4M=UUoLNDZNRFFcG9hd=Gxc7ma5jwkJQ2-qTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:28:31 -0600
From:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Cc:	Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
	"linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [CIFS] Fix signed/unsigned pointer warning

merged into cifs-2.6.git

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
>> Probably harmless patch - but I didn't notice the warning on x86
>> kernel build (building on Fedora 21, gcc 4.9.2)
>
> Did you test x86 32-bit or 64-bit?  In the generic do_div()

I built current mainline with 64 bit disabled. No warnings on this
before or after the patch.

> implementation, only the former case has an explicit type check.
>
> FWIW I'm on 32-bit bit MIPS.



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/