linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc-core: call udc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1412151112150.27915-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:14:55 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>
cc:	balbi@...com, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<peter.chen@...escale.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	<k.opasiak@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc-core: call udc_stop() before gadget
 unbind

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Robert Baldyga wrote:

> As usb function drivers assumes that all usb request will be completed
> before function unbind call, we should supply such behavior. In some
> cases ep_disable() won't kill all request effectively, because some
> IN requests can be in running state. In such situation it's possible
> to have unbind function called before last request completion, which
> can cause problems.
> 
> For example unbinding f_ecm function while request on 'notify' endpoint
> is not completed, ends up NULL pointer dereference in unbind() function.
> 
> usb_gadget_udc_stop() call causes completion of all requests so if it's
> called before gadget unbind there is no risk that some of requests will
> stay uncompleted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c
> index e31d574..6f0d233 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c
> @@ -331,8 +331,8 @@ static void usb_gadget_remove_driver(struct usb_udc *udc)
>  
>  	usb_gadget_disconnect(udc->gadget);
>  	udc->driver->disconnect(udc->gadget);
> -	udc->driver->unbind(udc->gadget);
>  	usb_gadget_udc_stop(udc);
> +	udc->driver->unbind(udc->gadget);
>  
>  	udc->driver = NULL;
>  	udc->dev.driver = NULL;

There has been a lot of churn and a lot of bug fixes involving those
lines of code.  Have you checked the git log for this function?  It's
quite possible that interchanging those two statements will recreate a
bug that has already been fixed.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/