[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1418687596.2674.25.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:53:16 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Greg Donald <gdonald@...il.com>,
"John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
Andriy Skulysh <Andriy_Skulysh@...atex.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
James Simmons <uja.ornl@...il.com>, HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: obdclass: lprocfs_status.c:
Fix for possible null pointer dereference
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 23:23 +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Hi Joe
Hello Rickard
> No, it does not look like end can be NULL then.
> Then remove the end != NULL instead?
> ...
> if (end != NULL && *end == '.') {
Up to you.
> However, I am hesitant to the tolower() I think double case is faster...?
I doubt code execution speed is paramount here.
Maybe see if the object code size is smaller one
way or the other.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists