[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141216003648.GA32627@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:36:48 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: add ids for future xeon cpus
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:14:15AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Enable RAPL driver on Xeon cpu id 0x56.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> index c71443c..ee00ffb 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[] = {
> RAPL_CPU(0x45, rapl_defaults_core),/* Haswell ULT */
> RAPL_CPU(0x4C, rapl_defaults_atom),/* Braswell */
> RAPL_CPU(0x4A, rapl_defaults_atom),/* Tangier */
> + RAPL_CPU(0x56, rapl_defaults_atom),/* Future Xeon */
Is rapl_defaults_atom correct, or should this be rapl_defaults_core ?
Guenter
> RAPL_CPU(0x5A, rapl_defaults_atom),/* Annidale */
> {}
> };
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists