lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:09:48 +0800
From:	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: sched: odd values for effective load calculations

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:51:46PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 12/15/2014 07:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry for the long delay, I was out for a few weeks due to having become
> > a dad for the second time.
> 
> Congrats! May you be able to sleep at night sooner rather than later.
 
Congrats +1.

> 
> It's fairy reproducible, I've seen it happen quite a few times. What other
> information might be useful?
> 

Sasha, it might be helpful to see this_load is from:

this_load1: this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx);

or

this_load2: this_load += effective_load(tg, this_cpu, -weight, -weight);

It really does not seem to be this_load1, while the calc of effective_load is a bit
complicated to see what the problem is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists