[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54900684.6040802@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:16:36 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
<arm@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.19 #1
Le 15/12/2014 23:20, Kevin Hilman a écrit :
> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> writes:
>
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> I'm sending today a "fixes" branch which somehow continues the cleanup with
>> only code removal. I was waiting for the arm-soc *and* pinctrl material to
>> reach Linus T.'s tree before sending this pull-request. In fact this sequence
>> was needed for the gpio header removal. The little patch about #include
>> deletion just follows an earlier merge conflict in arm-soc tree: I was also
>> waiting for this moment before sending the definitive fix, just to be sure.
>>
>> Otherwise, all is pretty straightforward.
>>
>> Oh, one more thing: it is based on the current Linus' git tree, I can obviously
>> rebase everything on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released if you prefer.
>
> Yes, waiting a bit and basing on v3.19-rc1 is preferred since none of
> this seems like urgent fixes needed for stuff introduced during the
> merge window.
Absolutely, I'll do this.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists