linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [userns] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1418694459.5745.198.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:47:39 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [userns] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
 dereference at (null)

On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 11:31 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:
> 
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-testing
> > commit bbea5f5532501fdd67f46442ba7b1122d7ff3123 
> > ("userns: Add a knob to disable setgroups on a per user namespace basis")
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> I am quite puzzled by this failure.  There was an similar failure when
> /proc/[pid]/setgroups was read (if I recall correctly).  I don't see how
> that change could result at failures during open or failures during
> boot.  I added a new file to proc which any reasonable system should
> leave alone.  Are you by chance running trinity during boot?

Yes.  We are running trinity during boot.

> If the reproducer gave me any clue about which file that was opened or
> which code path this happened on I would be bery interested.  If for no
> other reason that to confirm that I have fixed the issue.

This is just boot test, with trinity running after kernel boot.

Fengguang, do you have more information?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> I have rewritten the implementation of /proc/[pid]/setgroups so it is
> simpler and more robust and does not have any errors I can detect.
> 
> Thank you very much for picking up my for-testing branch and beating up
> on it.
> 
> Eric


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/