[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54907E1C.10300@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:46:52 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...il.com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
CC: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@...il.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Possible regression with commit 52221610d
On 12/14/2014 09:48 PM, Tim Kryger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se> wrote:
...
>> Or simply; what is vmmc (in the code) supposed to represent?
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> VMMC is the supply that delivers power out to the SD card itself (aka VDD).
>
> It is not the internal power rail/power domain of the host controller
> within the SoC.
I've seen this question come up quite a few times.
Should Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt document the
vmmc/vqmmc regulators? I assume they're considered shared across all
MMC/SDHCI controller bindings?
Since that only covers DT, it might be nice to document vmmc-vs-vqmmc
somewhere else too, such as right by the devm_regulator_get_optional()
calls in mmc_regulator_get_supply() in drivers/mmc/core/core.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists