[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokZCK3TAZx1mwo3zLxugkxg-h7MAXkTxA4LVWausufDYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:48:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
"Jacob Pan (jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com)"
<jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Zijlstra, Peter" <peter.zijlstra@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [nohz] 2a16fc93d2c: kernel lockup on idle injection
On 16 December 2014 at 02:54, Pan, Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me. You can add my Reviewed-by to the above patch.
Thanks.
> I have tested this fix and confirm powerclamp is working properly now.
Oh, nice.
> However, we also have a planned patch for consolidated idle loop. With this patch it causes some erratic behavior in idle injection.
> I can’t seem to synchronize/align idle time around jiffies with this patch + fix.
>
> Any suggestions welcome.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/56
And all works fine without this patch ?
2a16fc93d2c9 ("nohz: Avoid tick's double reprogramming in highres mode")
I really don't know what stuff out of the two patches I posted (The above one
and the fix I posted yesterday), will possible make the synchronization bad ..
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists