[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54917BCC.9070001@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:49:16 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SCHED_DEADLINE fixes
Hi Luca,
On 17/12/14 10:50, Luca Abeni wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed some discrepancies between the schedule produced
> by SCHED_DEADLINE and the expectations from real-time
> scheduling theory. After some investigations, it turned out
> that such discrepancies are due to two bugs in deadline.c,
> which are particularly visible when using global scheduling
> on multiple CPUs (see the two patches for more details).
>
> I think the first bug (fixed in patch 0001) is particularly
> critical, because it causes a violation of the SCHED_DEADLINE
> guarantee (if the total load is smaller than the number of
> CPUs, there is an upper bound for the response times. This is
> a well known property for global EDF, but is not respected by
> SCHED_DEADLINE - see patch 0001 for more details).
> The second patch is IMHO also important, but less critical.
>
I already reviewed and tested them. They looks ok and are important
fixes. ACK for both. :)
Thanks a lot!
- Juri
> Luca Abeni (2):
> Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
> Avoid double-accounting in case of missed deadlines
>
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 25 ++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists