[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141217154507.GA20471@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:45:07 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Avoid horrible stack usage
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:35:08PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > looks like we could also sanitize the perf_ftrace_function_call
> > in the same way.. like below (untested)
> >
> > hum, I just noticed it actually has pt_regs arg ;-)
>
> Bu if it has pt_regs should we not use that instead of filling one out
> again?
yep, I talked to Steven about that and the thing is that
it's not guaranteed on all archs.. I'll send patch that
take that in account
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists