[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5491B0A1.7080601@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:34:41 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
CC: <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/blkfront: increase the default value
of xen_blkif_max_segments
On 17/12/14 16:13, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:18:58PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> On 12/16/2014 06:32 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> El 16/12/14 a les 11.11, Bob Liu ha escrit:
>>>> The default maximum value of segments in indirect requests was 32, IO
>>>> operations with bigger block size(>32*4k) would be split and performance start
>>>> to drop.
>>>>
>>>> Nowadays backend device usually support 512k max_sectors_kb on desktop, and
>>>> may larger on server machines with high-end storage system.
>>>> The default size 128k was not very appropriate, this patch increases the default
>>>> maximum value to 128(128*4k=512k).
>>>
>>> This looks fine, do you have any data/graphs to backup your reasoning?
>>>
>>
>> I only have some results for 1M block size FIO test but I think that's
>> enough.
>>
>> xen_blkfront.max Rate (MB/s) Percent of Dom-0
>> 32 11.1 31.0%
>> 48 15.3 42.7%
>> 64 19.8 55.3%
>> 80 19.9 55.6%
>> 96 23.0 64.2%
>> 112 23.7 66.2%
>> 128 31.6 88.3%
>>
>> The rates above are compared against the dom-0 rate of 35.8 MB/s.
>>
>>> I would also add to the commit message that this change implies we can
>>> now have 32*128+32 = 4128 in-flight grants, which greatly surpasses the
>>
>> The number could be larger if using more pages as the
>> xen-blkfront/backend ring based on Wei Liu's patch "xenbus_client:
>> extend interface to suppurt multi-page ring", it helped improve the IO
>> performance a lot on our system connected with high-end storage.
>> I'm preparing resend related patches.
>
> Or potentially making the request and response be seperate rings - and the
> response ring entries not tied in to the request. As in right now if we
> have an request at say slot 1,5, and 7, we expect the response to be at
> slot 1,5, and 7 as well.
No. Responses are placed in the first available slot. The response is
associated with the original request by the ID field.
See make_response().
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists