[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1418837187.14140.22.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:26:27 -0800
From: Joe Perches <realty@...ches.com>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: enable MAINTAINERS warning only for
--strict,--subjective
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 07:53 -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 23:35 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> The rule which delivers this warning is very prone to errors:
> >> "added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?"
> >> so it should not be enabled by default.
> >
> > I don't think so.
> >
> > It's _far_ more common for people to forget to
> > update MAINTAINERS so I think it's quite useful
> > even if it's slightly noisy.
>
> In a recent submission I saw a bunch of these warnings too, even
> though I had already added MAINTAINERS entries.
>
> If this is just a friendly reminder ("hey, please double-check X
> before you send") rather than an indication that a suspected problem
> was detected in the patch, perhaps it would be better if it lived in
> Documentation/SubmitChecklist?
An entry might help.
Submit a patch to SubmitChecklist and see if the
overall MAINTAINERS patterns error rate changes
over a few release cycles.
Another thing that might help you not see these
by creating a .checkpatch.conf file and adding:
"--ignore=FILE_PATH_CHANGES"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists