| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1418840550.14140.27.camel@perches.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:22:30 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Hariharan Rangasamy <hariharanrangasamy@...il.com> Cc: oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: lustre: lproc_osc.c: used seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 23:29 +0530, Hariharan Rangasamy wrote: > Replaced seq_printf() with seq_puts() [] > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c [] > @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int osc_checksum_type_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > else > seq_printf(m, "%s ", cksum_name[i]); > } > - seq_printf(m, "\n"); > + seq_puts(m, "\n"); This could be seq_putc > return 0; > } > > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int osc_rpc_stats_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > seq_printf(seq, "pending read pages: %d\n", > atomic_read(&cli->cl_pending_r_pages)); > > - seq_printf(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n"); > + seq_puts(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n"); > seq_printf(seq, "pages per rpc rpcs %% cum %% |"); > seq_printf(seq, " rpcs %% cum %%\n"); These and others could be seq_puts too, just use % instead of %% -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists