[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141217002635.GB19459@lerouge>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:26:36 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [nohz] 2a16fc93d2c: kernel lockup on idle injection
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:54:51PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > But yes, that should work just fine..
>
> So I'm not the only one who thinks that this needs a proper
> reimplementation :)
Besides, if this works, we'll have way less IPIs, and people
usually like that :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists