linux-kernel - Re: algif_hash: splice of data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:22:20 +0100
From:	leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	'LKML' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: algif_hash: splice of data > 2**16

Le 18/12/2014 13:15, Stephan Mueller a écrit :
> Hi Herbert,
>
> While testing the vmsplice/splice interface of algif_hash I was made
> aware of the problem that data blobs larger than 16 pages do not seem to
> be hashed properly.
>
> For testing, a file is mmap()ed and handed to vmsplice / splice. If the
> file is smaller than 2**16, the interface returns the proper hash.
> However, when the file is larger, only the first 2**16 bytes seem to be
> used.
>
> When adding printk's to hash_sendpage, I see that this function is
> invoked exactly 16 times where the first 15 invocations have the
> MSG_MORE flag set and the last invocation does not have MSG_MORE.
>
>
Hi Stephan,

I have already noticed the same issue and proposed a patch, but I never 
got any feedback and it has never been merged, allthought I pinged it a 
few times.

See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/18/276

Christophe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/