linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] i8k: Remove laptop specific config data (fan_mult, fan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21066.1418915331@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:08:51 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:	Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>,
	Jochen Eisinger <jochen@...guin-breeder.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] i8k: Remove laptop specific config data (fan_mult, fan_max) from driver

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:08:58 +0100, Pali Rohár said:

> So your BIOS cannot report nominal_rpm and because your machine=20
> is not in dmi list, all 3 patches do nothing for your machine.
> 
> But you need to set multiplier to 1, right?
> 
> What about this patch? (on top of 3/3)
> 
> --- a/drivers/char/i8k.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/i8k.c
> @@ -850,6 +850,10 @@ static int __init i8k_probe(void)
>  		 */
>  		for (fan = 0; fan < I8K_FAN_COUNT; ++fan) {
>  			i8k_fan_mult[fan] = I8K_FAN_DEFAULT_MULT;
> +			if (i8k_get_fan_rpm(fan) > I8K_FAN_MAX_RPM) {
> +				i8k_fan_mult[fan] = 1;
> +				continue;
> +			}
>  			for (val = 0; val < 256; ++val) {


Dell Latitude E6530, linux-next 20141208 plus the 3 patches you
posted on Nov 30 (support labels), plus the 4 of 3 patches in
this go around, and sensors reports:

i8k-virtual-0
Adapter: Virtual device
fan2:        2774 RPM

and under CPU load, that number rises to 3200 or so, so it seems to be
working....

So you probably should fold this into the current set of patches, and
feel free to put this in there:

Tested-By: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped